PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

This paper compares the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64- bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. The principal goal guiding the design of any encryption algorithm must be security. In the real world, however, performance and implementation cost are always of concern. Making the assumption that the major AES candidates are secure (a big assumption, to be sure, but one that is best dealt with in another paper), the most important properties the algorithms will be judged on will be the performance and cost of implementation. In this paper, we will completely ignore security. Instead, we will compare the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64-bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. For each platform, we first make some general observations on the performance issues for each of the platforms, then compare the various AES candidates, and finally look at the specific issues for each of the candidates.

Comparing Performance of JavaScript Cryptography Libraries

Performance Analysis of Enhanced AES-128 and Blowfish Algorithms

PDF] Investigating the Effects of varying the Key Size on the

PDF] Comparative Study Of AES, Blowfish, CAST-128 And DES

wolfSSL and wolfCrypt Benchmarks

Secure Enclave - Apple Support

Performance analysis of AES, DES and Blowfish cryptographic

An Advanced Encryption Standard in Memory (AESIM) Efficient, High

AES encryption performance comparison with Sun et al. [3

Performance analysis of AES, DES and Blowfish cryptographic

PDF) Analysis and Comparison between AES and DES Cryptographic

Frontiers Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with