The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether The Last of Us Part I is worth the $70 asking price, the question surrounding this remake is how much the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog treat this as a total do-over, changing the level design, gameplay mechanics and player upgrades? It has become obvious over the last few weeks, as Sony released a handful of preview videos, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the game directors told Engadget that the goal was to bring massively updated visuals and a host of quality-of-life improvements to a game that would otherwise stay true to its roots.

Why The Last of Us Intro Is a Video Game Storytelling Masterpiece

Avengers: Endgame Directors Explain the Old Captain America Time

The Last Of Us Part I's PC Launch Pushed To Late March - Game Informer

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Last Of Us Part 2 Isn't For Everyone, Director Warns - GameSpot

The Last of Us Part II': Ashley Johnson Navigates Grief and Guilt

The Five Nights at Freddy's movie, explained - Vox

The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so

The Original Ending Of The Last of Us Was Going To Be

How Will 'The Last Of Us' End? The Original Game Ending & Possible

The Last of Us Part II Director's Cut: Kojima's Statement

The Last of Us Composer hints at a directors cut or remaster for

How Will 'The Last Of Us' End? The Original Game Ending & Possible